This story about Citrus Heights' (a suburb of Sacramento) attempts to shut
down its only topless club appeared in yesterday's Sacramento Bee.
BTW, the "national chain of 'genetlemen's clubs'" referred to in the story
is Deja Vu.
For five years, Mai-Lee Le worked as a dancer at Hiphuggers, a bikini club
in Sunnyvale. "I made very good money," said the 5-foot-2 Vietnamese immigrant,
who saved her cash, dreaming of one day buying her own cabaret. Her dream
came true in November 1995, when she bought a closed Citrus Heights nightclub
for $275,000. After obtaining a license from Sacramento County, she reopened
it in the spring of 1996 as Cheerleaders, a club featuring exotic dancers,
which eventually began to turn a profit. But when Citrus Heights incorporated
as a city on Jan. 1, 1997, Cheerleaders began to feel unwanted, Le said.
Now, the club and the city are locked in a legal war that will determine
to what extent Cheerleaders and other adult-entertainment establishments
can operate in the fledgling city. In a suit filed in U.S. District Court
last month, the club challenged the city's original ordinance regulating
adult-entertainment businesses. A judge, acting on the complaint, threw out
the city's measure on Dec. 14, calling parts of it unconstitutional. But
the battle is far from over.
The club's attorney, George W.M. Mull, has vowed to sue anew if the city
adopts two proposed ordinances to replace the one the judge tossed out. He
contends that the measures could be detrimental to Cheerleaders, which is
currently the city's only adult-entertainment club and is seeking a city
license. Meanwhile, as last week's City Council meeting demonstrated, many
residents in and around Citrus Heights vehemently oppose adult- entertainment
purveyors. Seventeen speakers went before the council, decrying what they
called the "corruption," "immorality" and "lewdness" of adult-entertainment
venues.
"These businesses bring in ... corruption," said Richard Sherman, senior
pastor of Sunrise Community Church in Fair Oaks. "They degrade women. They
degrade men. They degrade families." Sherman, who said many members of his
congregation live in Citrus Heights, demanded "the strongest possible law
you can adopt" to ban adult-entertainment firms in the city. Claiming that
no judge can dictate a community's way of life, some speakers urged the council
to "take on" the courts, even if it means higher taxes.
Others said the proposed ordinances don't go far enough. Noting that one
of the measures would require a 300-foot buffer between an adult- entertainment
business and the nearest church, park or private home, some speakers called
for a 1,000-foot requirement. Such a step would make it difficult for a club
such as Cheerleaders to function in the city. "We don't need any more
(adult-entertainment clubs)," said Lisa Ulseth, of the Association of Private
Christian Educators. "We have too many already."
But equally adamant was Le's new partner, Cheerleaders' co-owner Al Sol,
who defended the business. "I'm not trying to push my morals on anybody else,"
Sol told the council. "At Cheerleaders, we don't allow anyone under 21 ...
We've been very clean. "We haven't put up distasteful signs," he added,
explaining that the neon sign outside the club bears the words "exotic dancers"
instead of more graphic terms. His arguments appeared to have little sway
on the council, which opted to delay action on the new ordinances until Jan.
27 to allow staff members time to explore toughening the measures.
Le was not at the council meeting. Instead, she remained in her club, across
the street from the Rusch Park Community Center where the council was meeting.
"People think we are low-level. ... I don't understand," she said, smoking
a cigarette in a back room during an earlier interview. The club's main lounge
was shaking with pounding music -- the driving beat for the scantily clad
performers, whose dresses reflected the bright, flashing lights.
"Cheerleaders isn't as bad as everybody thinks it is," said one dancer, who
would give only her performing name of Tessa. "It's just a bar where dancers
take off their tops just as guys do (in the summer). "I don't see why anyone
has the right to say what I can and can't do for employment," said Tessa,
22. "The city should just lay off." Tessa said she began dancing at Cheerleaders
a year ago. She now earns $80 to $300 a night in tips. And, like Le, she
is saving her money. "I want to enroll in school, hopefully at Sacramento
City College this spring," she said. "I want to be a child psychologist.
I want to help children who've been through abuse."
Guests at the club are greeted by two signs: "Leave your attitude behind
this door" and "No touching the ladies," a reference to the 22 dancers whose
number includes nurses, dental assistants and college students. Mull, the
club's attorney, contends that adult entertainment of the type featured at
Cheerleaders is protected by the First Amendment and that the club would
not be able to operate under the city's proposed regulations. "My goal is
to have the city obey the Constitution," he said. "The goal is to have
Cheerleaders continue as a lawful business."
Mull also represents a national chain of "gentlemen's clubs" seeking to open
a Citrus Heights juice bar featuring non-alcoholic drinks and all- nude dancers.
The new ordinances do not call for a moratorium on such establishments, as
did the now-invalidated earlier ordinance. One proposed ordinance would require
the 300-foot buffer. The other would provide for a public hearing any time
a person applies to open an adult establishment. Mull said that neither ordinance
provides for prompt judicial review should the city deny a license -- a fault
the judge noted in ruling against the first ordinance. City Attorney Ruthann
Ziegler maintains the new ordinances do meet the legal requirements. Michael
Ross, a lobbyist for the adult-entertainment industry, said Cheerleaders'
opponents are misinformed.
"Most of the people opposed to this do not understand the industry in general,"
Ross said. "They think it's a negative industry that creates negative secondary
effects" such as crime, prostitution and drug use. While some of that may
have been true in the past, it's no longer the case today, he maintained.
"In the last seven to 10 years, the industry has changed dramatically," he
said. "Twenty years ago, there was an image that the industry was seedy and
run by low-lifes. (Now) you don't have hookers, prostitutes or drug addicts
working in the clubs. You now find women who are going to school, single
mothers, high-caliber people who ... are looking to go to school."
Le and Sol say they fit the mold of the new breed of owners. Before investing
in Cheerleaders more than a year ago, Sol had spent a quarter-century in
the corporate world. But for city officials, said Ziegler, the city attorney,
the character of the people who own adult businesses is not relevant. "I
have no idea whether such businesses are run by shady (characters) or not,"
Ziegler said. "That's not relevant to the issue."
What is at stake, she said, is the city's obligation to impose restrictions
that balance the rights of adult business interests with the vision Citrus
Heights residents have for their new community. The goal, she said, "is to
balance (the city's) obligation of allowing this sort of business with the
concerns of the community."